Author: Jasmine Kleine

  • Women Who Left Dog Covered in Sores is Jailed for 8 Weeks

    Women Who Left Dog Covered in Sores is Jailed for 8 Weeks

    A woman from Stockton-on-Tees has been jailed for eight weeks and disqualified from keeping animals for life after allowing an English bull terrier called ‘Skitz’ to suffer.

    Claire Louise Parkinson (D.O.B 24.6.82) of Doncaster Crescent appeared before Teesside Magistrates’ Court on Friday (9 December), in a prosecution case brought by the RSPCA.

    RSPCA inspector Clare Wilson said: “Skitz was in such a terrible condition that the vet considered the only humane thing to do was to put him to sleep to end his suffering.

    “There was discharge coming from his eyes and he was was blind as a result of a lack of necessary veterinary treatment.

    “His skin was covered in sores – they were literally all over his body – many of which were bleeding.

    “He was in a very distressed state.”

    Parkinson pleaded guilty to two offences under the Animal Welfare Act – between 24 August 2015 and 24 August 2016, causing unnecessary suffering to Skitz (1.) by failing to provide veterinary care and attention for his skin condition and (2.) by failing to provide veterinary care and attention for a problem with his eyes.

    The RSPCA had issued a warning notice in June 2014 as Skitz had a skin and eye condition and hadn’t seen a vet, and Parkinson did take him to the vets once in response to that.

    RSPCA inspector Wilson said: “The vets asked to see Skitz again in 7-10 days and advised that he would need ongoing medication.

    “We visited the address several times to check that Skitz was still receiving treatment but there was never an answer at the door and cards to call us were ignored. A neighbour told us they thought the dog was no longer there as they hadn’t seen him in the garden.”

    She added: “This was a case of extreme neglect for which there can be no excuse.

    “All owners are responsible for meeting the needs of the animals in their care, whatever those needs may be.

    “It took a very long time for Skitz to get into this state and he suffered a great deal.”

    A warrant is out for the arrest of Parkinson’s ex-partner and co-accused, Mark Neville Henry.

  • Appeal Court Lift Suspension of Pit Bull Restrictions in Montreal

    Appeal Court Lift Suspension of Pit Bull Restrictions in Montreal

    The Quebec Court of Appeal has lifted the suspension on Montreal’s controversial new animal control bylaw with the city agreeing to avoid ‘irreparable harm’, which means all pit bulls and pit bull type dogs in Montreal now need to wear a muzzle in public.

    The bylaw was temporarily suspended in October by Justice Louis Gouin who found the bylaw terms raised red flags (such as how you identify a pit bull type dog) and merited further review, which the city appealed.

    https://i.imgur.com/KFg3xIL.jpg

    The city’s council will meet to set out the time frame for owners to register their dogs later this month.

    As part of the appeal process, the city has agreed not to euthanize any pit bull-type dogs (find out more about how the city intend to identify a pit bull type dog here), unless they are found to be dangerous, show signs of becoming dangerous, or if they are stray, sick or badly hurt.

    Shelters will also be allowed to return lost pit bulls to their owners as long as they do not fall into any of the above categories.

    But the law may still be overturned as Montreal’s SPCA are still eager to set a date where they can argue their points against implementing the bylaw at the Superior Court.

  • London Assembly Backs Charity’s Calls to Review Dangerous Dogs Act

    London Assembly Backs Charity’s Calls to Review Dangerous Dogs Act

    With hopes of ending breed specific legislation in the UK, dog lovers and animal organisations alike have welcomed a motion unanimously agreed by members of the London Assembly to request a formal review into the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.

    The London Assembly agreed with a motion calling on the Mayor to write to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to request a formal review of the act, brought in 25 years ago.

    The RSPCA, who launched a campaign earlier this year calling on the Government to hold an inquiry into the effectiveness of the law believes part of the act – which uses breed specific legislation to prohibit owning four breeds and types of dog – Pit bull Terrier, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino and Fila Brasileiro – has failed to protect public safety and is seriously compromising dog welfare.

    Something echoed by other organisations across the globe who have seen breed specific legislation implemented with no decrease in dog attacks, in fact in Toronto, Canada dog attacks have risen.

    Speaking about the members of London Assembly’s decision to request a formal review into the DDA 1991, RSPCA senior parliamentary advisor, Rachel Williams, said: “Breed specific legislation is a piece of outdated and ineffective legislation which urgently needs reviewing, repealing and replacing with something which better protects the safety of the public as well as considering the welfare of dogs in this country.

    “Currently, breed specific legislation means that a well-rounded, well-behaved, much-loved family pet which has never shown any signs of aggression can be torn from his home and everything he knows and could face being put to sleep simply for looking a certain way.

    She continued, “Ultimately, we’d like to see this part of the Dangerous Dogs Act repealed and replaced with legislation which deals with dogs on an individual case-by-case basis and does not penalise dogs simply for the way the look.

    Assembly Member Steve O’Connell, who proposed the motion, said: “This is about recognising the current policies designed to protect people from dangerous dogs are not fit for purpose, as well as improving animal welfare standards.

    “It’s important that, if the current system is not working, we look at other ways of handling what is a growing problem.

    “The consequences for victims of a dog attack can be devastating and I hope the relevant authorities take note of our motion.”

    Add your voice to the RSPCA’s petition calling on the Government to review the law here

  • Does Your Dog Have Star Appeal? Celebrity Led Event Looking for Canine Stage Star

    Does Your Dog Have Star Appeal? Celebrity Led Event Looking for Canine Stage Star

    Comedian-actor-satirist Harry Shearer, best known for his iconic roles in Spinal Tap and The Simpsons, and his musician-singer-songwriter wife Judith Owen are searching for a Christmas loving dog, dubbed the ‘Dog Of Xmas’ to appear in Christmas Without Tears, a charity evening of music, comedy and variety taking place at King’s Place Concert Hall, London on December 8th 2016 and would like YOU to share your festive photos with them.

    Dog owners who fancy their beloved pooch as the next star of the stage should tweet a Christmassy attired pic of their canine to @Hamandhigh and @JudithOwen with a picture by December 6 and she/he could be picked to join the cast on December 8 as the ‘Dog of Xmas’.

    “Besides, don’t we all just want to look at photos of dogs in antlers?!” said Judith.

    The ‘Dog Of Xmas’ will join a formidable list of special guests including writer, director, radio presenter, comedian, actor and star of Extras and The Office Stephen Merchant, Oscar, Golden Globe and Grammy nominated actress of Downton Abbey, Elizabeth McGovern, Grammy and Emmy winning producer and instrumentalist Kipper Eldridge (Sting), Jacqui Dankworth, one of the most highly regarded vocalists in the UK, and Memphis treasure jazz pianist/singer Charlie Wood.

    They are joined by Chris Difford, co-founder of Squeeze, and singer songwriter and BBC Radio 2 favourite Nell Bryden and the rocking American singer and boogie-woogie pianist extraordinaire Doña Oxford.

    Adding to the Christmas feast of talent come lords of the London jazz scene The Kansas Smitty’s House Band, one fiddler fiddling in the shape of the classical violinist with attitude, Lizzie Ball and Classical Kicks, Brazilian drummer and percussionist Pedro Segundo, the most versatile and exciting cellist of her generation Gabriella Swallow, the country singer, poster girl of American democracy and global brand that is Tina C, all topped off with a partridge in a pear tree – darling of the airwaves, lifestyle guru for the over-eighties Barry From Watford aka the superlative Alex Lowe.

    As Harry Shearer tells it, “the show started as a party in our home to try to comfort Judith, a Welsh woman prone to melancholia, who could not stand that the fact that Christmas in Southern California was about 78 degrees and sunny.”

    What began as a humble holiday house party to chase away Judith’s yuletide blues became a charity event and performance in 2005 when they staged it to aid the people of New Orleans after Katrina. This year’s shows in London, Chicago, LA and NOLA will benefit a variety of different charities raising money for the homeless, mental health and musician’s assistance (USA shows).

  • Senator Bob Dole to Tell President Trump He ‘Ought to Have a Dog in the White House’

    Senator Bob Dole to Tell President Trump He ‘Ought to Have a Dog in the White House’

    Senator Bob Dole has revealed he has spoken with President-Elect Donald Trump and will be advising him to get a dog when he moves into the White House next year.

    The newly elected President doesn’t own a dog and as K9 Magazine has previously shared, history is littered with leaders and their dogs, especially in the White House which will say goodbye to Bo and Sunny when the Obamas move out.

    Senator Dole’s own dog, Leader, regularly accompanied him to work (pictured below) and along with his wife, they have owned many dogs for years. Indeed, Leader II was honoured by the Doles with a birthday party in 2012 commemorating his 13th birthday with a party for friends and family, including the couple’s 16 other dogs.


    Photo Credit: Robert J. Dole Archive and Special Collections

    Speaking at the ASPCA awards where he was honoured with their Presidential Service Award, Senator Dole said: “I didn’t realize when I was elected to Congress in 1961 that you could do things that would make a difference for animals — these poor defenseless creatures that are being mistreated.”


    Photo Credit: ASPCA

    With 35 years in Congress and experience as a decorated soldier, former Senator Bob Dole is well known for serving his country, but is perhaps less well known, until now, for he used his time in public office to help animals in need.

    While in office, Dole championed humane legislation, advocated for animals in crisis, and brought critical attention to important animal issues.

    In 1974, after learning the U.S. Army experimented with toxic chemicals on beagles, Dole introduced a bill outlawing the practice. He championed important amendments to the Humane Slaughter Act, which mandated unprecedented humane standards and inspections for facilities producing meat for the public. In 1984, he was awarded the ASPCA Award for Humane Excellence for his consistent commitment to protecting vulnerable animals in the U.S.

    Since his retirement from politics in 1996, the 93-year-old has remained active in the animal welfare cause, advocating for a permanent ban on horse slaughter, protecting the pets of domestic violence victims, and condemning the barbaric treatment of farm animals at the USDA’s U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC).

    His advocacy helped encourage Congress to take action to ensure the facility’s compliance with the Animal Welfare Act. As recently as July, Dole graciously participated in a series of ASPCA events in Washington D.C. that showcase the selfless work of our nation’s animal shelters and the importance of passing key animal welfare legislation.

    Here’s why animals are so important to him and how it all began for Senator Dole.

  • Puppy Farmers Are Jailed For Leaving Dead & Dying Dogs in a Wheelbarrow

    Puppy Farmers Are Jailed For Leaving Dead & Dying Dogs in a Wheelbarrow

    Two people have been disqualified from keeping dogs for life for a string of animal welfare offences following an RSPCA investigation into the underground puppy trade.

    Inspectors from the animal welfare charity and police found a wheelbarrow of dead and dying dogs at a farm in Bradford after launching an investigation following calls from members of the public who had bought puppies which became ill.

    On Friday (18 November), a man and a woman appeared at Leeds Magistrates’ Court for sentencing in connection with a number of animal welfare offences relating to puppies and dogs seized from the property, in Tyersal Lane, following the warrant in September last year.

    Farm manager John Wilcock (DoB: 09/07/80) of Sticker Lane, Bradford, admitted five offences while Bernadette Nunney (DoB: 04/11/91), of Tyersal Lane, Bradford, pleaded not guilty to six offences. She was found guilty on 20 October following a four-day trial.

    Today, the duo were both sentenced to 20 weeks in prison, suspended for 18 months, and were each disqualified from keeping dogs for life.

    Nunney was also handed a 12 week curfew order, ordered to complete a 15-day rehabilitation activity, and ordered to pay £500 in costs.

    Wilcock was ordered to complete 200 hours of unpaid work and a 20-day rehabilitation activity. He was also ordered to pay £100 in costs.

    When RSPCA officers and police executed the warrant they came across a wheelbarrow of dead collie puppies. As they filmed the heartbreaking scene for evidence they realised that one of the pups – a black and white female, buried beneath the dead bodies of her littermates – was still alive.

    She was rushed to the vets but later died. Post mortems revealed that she and her siblings had died from parvovirus.

    Nunney and Wilcock were accused of causing unnecessary suffering to the seven puppies, as well as a number of other offences [full details below]. They also faced three further allegations of causing unnecessary suffering to a total of 10 dogs, and two offences of failing to meet the needs of 30 dogs.

    RSPCA inspector Emma Ellis, who investigated, said: “What I saw that day will stay with me forever.

    “The sight of the live puppy buried within the pile of dead puppies was heartbreaking. There was nothing we could do to save her. The way those puppies were left to die highlights how these people simply see them as commodities which I find totally unacceptable.

    “Dozens of dogs were being kept at the address in stables and kennel blocks. Many had no food, no water, no bedding, and all of them were living in their own filth.”

    http://i.imgur.com/xPHpupk.jpg

    Inspectors found 43 dogs – including collies, spaniels, bichon frises, Labradors, beagles, Chihuahuas, and some terrier-cross types – most of which were seized by the police and placed into the RSPCA’s care.

    RSPCA special operations unit chief inspector (CI) Ian Briggs, said: “There is a growing demand for certain breeds of dogs – such as chihuahuas, spaniels and bichon frises – and genuine, regulated breeders simply cannot meet demand.

    “Unregulated puppy breeders and dealers are plugging this gap in the market by producing dogs on a commercial scale and putting money and profits ahead of the health, welfare and happiness of the dogs.

    “When our investigations bring us to places such as this farm, we often find dogs living in squalid, sub-standard conditions meaning the unsuspecting public often end up parting with hundreds and hundreds of pounds for puppies who have behavioural issues or health problems throughout their lives. In some of the worst cases, their beloved family pet dies in their arms just days after bringing them home.”

    The case came to court following an investigation by the RSPCA as well as a sting by journalists from BBC’s Watchdog. During their investigation, reporters bought a dog (pictured above) from the Bradford farm which was then rehomed with animal behaviourist Carrie Evans.

    “Gizmo was exceptionally frightened and very poorly,” Carrie said. “He was grossly underweight, had worms, had an intestinal infection, and infected ears.

    “Due to bad breeding, Gizmo has horrendous deformities in his legs and feet, and his feet can sometimes rotate backwards. He also has an undershot jaw.”

    CI Briggs added: “When our investigations bring us to places such as this farm, we often find dogs living in squalid, sub-standard conditions.

    “Unsuspecting members of the public end up parting with hundreds and hundreds of pounds for puppies who have behavioural issues because they’ve not been properly socialised, or health problems, due to poor conditions and no veterinary treatment. In some of the worst cases, their beloved family pet dies in their arms just days after bringing them home.”

    The RSPCA has launched a campaign to tackle the underground market in puppies following a 122% increase in the number of calls the charity’s cruelty line receives on the issue. The Scrap the Puppy Trade campaign is calling on the Government in England to introduce stricter legislation around the breeding and selling of dogs, and also seeks to help the public in how to responsibly buy a puppy.

  • Dog Owners Walk Three Times Further Than Non-Dog Owners

    Hot on the heels of academic research that dog owners are happier, healthier and live longer than non-dog owners, a pet food firm has given further insight into why this might be ahead of their The One Brit And His Dog study due to be published in the Spring.

    According to the pet food manufacturer the reason dog owners are fitter and healthier than non-dog owners could easily be put down to the fact that dog owners typically walk 21 miles a week, whereas non-dog owners walk only 7.

    The report, which has been commissioned by Butcher’s Pet Care indicates that people who own a dog are likely to exercise at least three times more a week than the rest of the nation, as they walk or run for an average of 74 minutes every day, in addition to their normal exercise.

    Of those who took part in the survey, seven in 10 dog owners said they love the fact they manage to get so much exercise now they own a dog, with the majority feeling fitter, healthier and more energetic since owning a dog, and not just in body, but in spirit too, while one in 3 also said walking their dogs allowed them to de-stress after work, and a quarter felt it helped them to escape their busy schedules.

    Commenting on the findings, Clare Scallon, marketing manager at the pet food firm said: “Decades ago, owners very rarely needed to walk their dog as they were often just let out into the garden or roamed the local area freely, but times have changed! It is now up to the owners to keep their dogs fit and due to this their fitness levels have increased too.”

  • Dog Owners in These Regions Were Fined Almost £250,000 Last Year, Where Does Yours Rank?

    Dog Owners in These Regions Were Fined Almost £250,000 Last Year, Where Does Yours Rank?

    New research out today has revealed that councils across the UK have issued dog owners with more than 6,000 dog fouling fines raising over £360,000 from 2015 to July 2016, with £247,282 raised last year alone.

    The findings, which have been released by Direct Line Pet Insurance detail which regions were handed more fines for not cleaning up after their dogs. Where does yours feature on the list?

    No.1 offender: Scotland

    863 fines issued for dog fouling
    12,906 reports received for dog fouling
    = £28,860 raised

    No.2 offender: North West

    698 fines issued for dog fouling
    12,723 reports received for dog fouling
    = £45,628 raised

    No.3 offender: Yorkshire & the Humberside

    623 fines issued for dog fouling
    9,731 reports received for dog fouling
    = £35,560 raised

    No.4 offender: Wales

    615 fines issued for dog fouling
    7,403 reports received for dog fouling
    = £48,225 raised

    No.5 offender: East Midlands

    341 fines issued for dog fouling
    5,689 reports received for dog fouling
    = £8,470 raised

    No.6 offender: North East

    264 fines issued for dog fouling
    10,344 reports received for dog fouling
    = £14,748 raised

    No.7 offender: West Midlands

    217 fines issued for dog fouling
    5,016 reports received for dog fouling
    = £12,810 raised

    No.8 offender: South East

    200 fines issued for dog fouling
    9,509 reports received for dog fouling
    = £8,676 raised

    No.9 offender: Northern Ireland

    182 fines issued for dog fouling
    1,614 reports received for dog fouling
    = £14,030 raised

    No.10 offender: South West

    178 issued for dog fouling
    5,088 reports received for dog fouling
    = £11,405 raised
    No.11 offender: London

    160 issued for dog fouling
    8,187 reports received for dog fouling
    = £11,720 raised

    No.12 offender: East of England

    110 issued for dog fouling
    5,803 reports received for dog fouling
     = £7,150 raised

    Henry Leonard, AOP Clinical & Regulatory Officer, commented on the health implications of not picking up after your dog saying:It’s important to recognise that not picking up after pets can indeed have wider consequences for public health. There is a risk to the sight, particularly in children, from an infection called toxocariasis which is caused by a parasite present in animal faeces, predominantly dogs. The risk comes from the eggs of the parasitic worm, Toxocara Canis, when they are ingested rather than necessarily getting some in the eye. This can either be from direct contact with faeces or more frequently from contaminated soil.

    “While cases are rare, toxocariasis can cause a variety of serious problems in the body. The eye is a common site for it to lodge and the effects can be devastating to the sight unless it’s treated promptly. A blood test can usually detect it but you may also need an eye examination to look for parasites.”

    Dog fouling orders are governed under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 which allows local authorities to set out specific public space protection orders (PSPOs) for their area, detailing that owners must clear up after their dogs in certain public areas4. If a PSPO is ignored, dog owners can be given an on the spot fine (fixed penalty notice) usually between £50 & £80, or up to £1,000 if it goes to court.

  • Are These MPs Right in Wanting To Strip RSPCA of Prosecution Powers?

    Are These MPs Right in Wanting To Strip RSPCA of Prosecution Powers?

    The RSPCA should be stripped of its powers to routinely prosecute animal welfare cases, according to some MPs. The Commons environment committee said there was a “Conflict of interest” between the charity’s power to prosecute and its role in investigating cases, campaigning and fundraising.

    RSPCA chief executive Jeremy Cooper rejected the MPs’ criticism.

    “We are extremely proud of our near 200 years of experience investigating and prosecuting animal cruelty and our 92% success rate – which is currently a higher percentage than the CPS,” he said.

  • Pet Owners Beware: Product Defect Recall Alert for Armitage Pet Care Flea and Tick Drops for Dogs and Armitage Flea Drops for Cats & Kittens

    Pet Owners Beware: Product Defect Recall Alert for Armitage Pet Care Flea and Tick Drops for Dogs and Armitage Flea Drops for Cats & Kittens

    This week a product defect recall alert has been issued for Armitage Pet Care Flea and Tick Drops for Dogs and Armitage Flea Drops for Cats & Kittens manufactured by Bio-Tech Solutions Ltd.

    The alert reads:

    We wish to make wholesalers, veterinary surgeons, retailers and pet owners aware that the VMD has been notified that Bio-Tech Solutions Ltd has issued a recall of:

    1. Armitage Pet Care Flea and Tick Drops for Dogs 702 mg spot-on solution (Vm 20205/4003)
    2. Armitage Flea Drops for Cats and Kittens

    An unknown quantity of the Armitage Pet Care Flea and Tick Drops for Dogs containing permethrin has been distributed in packaging labelled Armitage Flea Drops for Cats and Kittens.

    Exposure to even small quantities of concentrated permethrin can cause severe and fatal poisoning in cats.

    If you have one of the products, do not use it on your cat.

    What to do if you have these products at home

    Return the product to the place of purchase or contact the company: John Tharratt, Bio-Tech solutions Tel 08704 450154 or email JTharratt@btsl.uk.com.

  • MP Claims Report Into Animal Welfare Says Banning of Third Party Puppy Sales Hard to Enforce & Key Messages Will Be Overlooked as a Result of RSPCA Headlines: Here’s What You Need to Know

    MP Claims Report Into Animal Welfare Says Banning of Third Party Puppy Sales Hard to Enforce & Key Messages Will Be Overlooked as a Result of RSPCA Headlines: Here’s What You Need to Know

    Today (16 November) the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee (EFRA) has released its report into Animal welfare in England with a focus on domestic pets, which includes dogs, cats and horses.

    A parliamentary enquiry was launched to examine the effectiveness and enforcement of animal welfare laws and the report includes these key recommendations and conclusions for the British government.

      • Pass regulations to protect the genetic viability and welfare of offspring as well as adult dogs
      • Update legislation governing the breeding of dogs with a licensing regime based on modern welfare standard
      • Require anyone breeding two litters or more per year to be licensed as a breeder
        Breeders have an important responsibility to provide for the social development and broader welfare requirements for puppies in their care. We recommend that the legislation governing the breeding of dogs should be updated with a licensing regime based on modern welfare standards
      • A national inspectorate should be established to liaise and support local authorities in enforcing the licensing regime, undertaking inspections and dealing with complaints
      • Ban third party sale of dogs. Dogs should only be available from licensed, regulated breeders or approved rehoming organisations
      • Make it compulsory that all internet pet advertisements should include the registration or licence number of the seller
      • Make the Pet Advertising Advisory Group’s minimum standards mandatory for all websites where pets are advertised and sold
      • Increase the age at which dogs are allowed to enter the United Kingdom under the Pet Travel Scheme to six months
      • Place a statutory duty on local authorities to enforce the Animal Welfare Act. The Government must ensure that appropriate resources are made available to local authorities to support them in this extension of their statutory duties
      • The RSPCA should continue its important work investigating animal welfare cases and working closely with the police and statutory authorities
        It should, however, withdraw from acting as a prosecutor of first resort where there are statutory bodies with a duty to carry out this role. We are not convinced by its arguments that it is in a better position than the CPS to prosecute animal welfare cases
      • Animal welfare cases in England are amongst the lowest in Europe. We recommend the maximum penalty is increased to five years 
      • Examines the potential for the establishment of an animal abuse register of those convicted of animal cruelty offences and who have been disqualified from keeping animals

    The committee feels these adaptations will improve the transparency, traceability and enforcement of regulations in the pet trade.

    However with the headline of the Commons EFRA’s own press release shared with the report focusing on the RSPCA, it’s no wonder MP Angela Smith, who sat on the committee for this inquiry, and others within the pet industry feels the key message will be derailed.

    Gudrun Ravetz, President of the British Veterinary Association (BVA) has commented on the report welcoming the recommendations to realise the full effectiveness of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 but goes on to say, “The RSPCA is currently responsible for over 90% of prosecution activity on animal welfare issues and it is unclear who else would have the resources to take on this vital role. EFRACom’s focus on the RSPCA’s prosecution powers is a disappointing distraction from a report that, otherwise, makes many positive recommendations towards improving UK pet welfare.”

    On the topic of the RSPCA, the press release which accompanied the report said:

    “The RSPCA should withdraw from acting as a prosecutor of first resort where there are statutory bodies with a duty to carry out this role, MPs on the Environment Food and Rural Affairs Committee have said.

    Followed by this quote on behalf of the chair of the Committee, Neil Parish MP:

    “The RSPCA does important working investigating animal welfare cases. And I would like to see its dedicated and professional staff continue that vital work. The Committee is not convinced, however, that the RSPCA is in a better position than the Crown Prosecution Service when it comes to prosecuting animal welfare cases. It should step back from making prosecutions itself, continuing instead to work closely with the police and prosecution service to protect the welfare of animals.”

    In a statement released by the office of Angela Smith MP, former Shadow Animal Welfare Minister and present member of the EFRA Select Committee, she said:

    “Today’s report by the EFRA select Committee into domestic animal welfare in England is I believe a missed opportunity to effectively promote improvements in animal welfare standards.

    “Unfortunately, the report’s very many sensible recommendations are in danger of being overlooked, thanks to the unwarranted attack on the RSPCA.

    “This is deeply disappointing and surprising, as during evidence sessions this view gained very little support from those who submitted evidence.”

    “Presently the RSPCA is responsible for over 90% of prosecution activity on animal welfare issues in England and the recommendations in the report are to some extent reckless, because there is no other body with the resources, the experience and the expertise necessary to take on this important role.”

    Speaking about the report RSPCA chief executive, Jeremy Cooper, said: “Overall this is a very sensible report with lots of progressive measures to improve animal welfare. We do not agree with the recommendation that the RSPCA should no longer prosecute. We are extremely proud of our near 200 years of experience investigating and prosecuting animal cruelty and our 92% success rate – which is currently a higher percentage than the CPS.”

    A further recommendation in the report, that a ban on 3rd party sales of puppies should be progressed, are also criticised by the MP because there is little said about how it could be enforced.

    Her thoughts are echoed by pet experts who worry it is nothing short of lip service.

    Puppy farming campaign group, Puppy Love Campaigns, whose work to investigate puppy farms has resulted in the closure and prosecution of more than 10 puppy farms shared these thoughts on Twitter:

    On this Angela point commented; “I think everyone on committee agreed and most of those giving evidence concurred that they would like to see an end to the 3rd party sale of puppies. However, much expert evidence said just banning it would not work.

    “Unfortunately, the report has very little to say about how enforcement of a ban would work, how this would be paid for, and who would enforce it, which is disappointing.

    “I am also disappointed the Committee didn’t accept much of the expert evidence that a strong and effective licensing system for sales is more likely to have the desired effect of stopping 3rd party sales.”

  • Graham Williams Gave Dog Drugs & Then Beat Her to Death With a Shovel

    Graham Williams Gave Dog Drugs & Then Beat Her to Death With a Shovel

    A man has been jailed after he fed his pet dog aspirin and paracetamol to try and kill her, before beating her to death with a shovel.

    Graham Williams (DOB 29/07/1956), of Falcon Road, Birkenhead, appeared at Wirral Magistrates’ Court today (Thursday 10 November), to be sentenced for two offences of causing unnecessary suffering to the German shepherd, by subjecting her to blunt force trauma and for failing to provide veterinary treatment for an infected mammary gland tumour.

    https://i.imgur.com/QCUHnw4.jpg

    Williams pleaded guilty to the two offences at an earlier hearing on 5 October.

    This week, he was sentenced to four months in prison and was disqualified from keeping all animals for life. The judge told the court that he would have imposed a longer sentence if the law allowed him to and he commended the RSPCA on its work to investigate such cases.

    RSPCA inspector Anthony Joynes, who investigated the case, said that the beating came to light after a member of the public heard Williams beating the dog and the dog squealing. He said: “They were so shocked that they dialed 999 immediately.

    “The dog, an 11-year-old German shepherd named Yarna, had been suffering with a melon-sized tumour and Williams decided to end things for her.

    “He fed her large amounts of aspirin and paracetamol and said this was an attempt to induce an overdose. Williams then took the dog outside and beat her multiple times over the head with a shovel, eventually leading to her death.

    “It was a brutal and barbaric end to her life at the hands of her owner whose responsibility it was to look after her and protect her from harm.

    “It is such a horrible way to die and I can’t even begin to imagine what Yarna’s last moments would have been like – the terror and pain she must have felt would have been unbearable.”

    A post mortem revealed Yarna had suffered multiple blunt force trauma injuries to the head.

    Inspector Joynes added: “This was an incredibly distressing case to deal with but I’m pleased that Yarna’s suffering hasn’t gone unanswered.”

  • Has John Lewis Learned Its Lesson After The Controversy Last Time They Used a Dog In Their Christmas TV Ad?

    Has John Lewis Learned Its Lesson After The Controversy Last Time They Used a Dog In Their Christmas TV Ad?

    The John Lewis Christmas TV ad has, for many, signalled the official start of the Christmas countdown. It’s the moment that allows people to begin to register the first tingling sensation that Santa is coming in the not too distant future.

    This year the retailer has included a dog in its advert in a way that they will hope is less likely to provoke the complaints that dogged its previous incursion in to dogs at Christmas territory, complaints that eventually lead to the chain pulling the advert.

    John Lewis’ 2016 Christmas TV ad strikes a different note. But remember kids, we don’t buy dogs for Christmas!

    Watch Buster The Boxer in The John Lewis Christmas 2016 TV Advert

  • RIP Ghost: Police Dog Killed in Pursuit of Intruders

    RIP Ghost: Police Dog Killed in Pursuit of Intruders

    A police dog has been killed after being run over pursuing intruders in Newton-le-Willows, Merseyside.

    The German Shepherd named Ghost was only three years old and was found shortly afterwards on the M6 nearby with traumatic injuries after being hit by a vehicle.

    Local police have confirmed no vehicles stopped at the scene where Ghost was found.


    Photo Credit: Twitter.com/MerseyPolice

    His handler, pictured above with Ghost is said to be “extremely upset” according to police colleagues. The pair had formed a bond and on recent shifts together had helped recover a stolen cash box.

    Speaking to the BBC, Inspector Tony Byrne said, “Ghost and his handler were a prolific team and he was a much valued member of our team and will be sorely missed.”

    This tragic news comes shortly after a police dog, Finn, was stabbed on duty. In his name a petition to honour police dogs was launched and with more than 100,000 signatures is due to be debated in parliament soon.

     

  • MP Calls for Changes in Attitude to Animal Abuse as Link Between Animal Cruelty and Domestic Abuse Found

    MP Calls for Changes in Attitude to Animal Abuse as Link Between Animal Cruelty and Domestic Abuse Found

    MP Anna Turley is calling for changes in attitude towards animal cruelty and will today (Tuesday 8 November) highlight research in Parliament uncovered by a team at Teesside University which has discovered links between animal abuse and domestic violence.

    The Redcar MP plans to highlight the research in a debate in favour of her Private Members Bill which seeks to toughen sentencing on animal cruelty perpetrators in order to quell the progression to violence against fellow humans.

    The study, which is the first of its kind in Europe, is titled ‘It’s a Dog’s Life’ and was led by Malcolm Plant, founder of the Making the Link study project and an Associate Researcher at Teesside University, along with Professor Paul van Schaik, Professor of Psychology at Teesside University.

    Research into animal abuse has often centred on Western cultures where such behaviour is socially unacceptable. This study looks at Eastern European communities, particularly those where animal abuse is endemic and socially acceptable.

    A number of communities examined had a large population of stray and neglected animals regularly facing violent attacks. This has created a vicious cycle of “endorsed aggression” in which witnesses of this unchallenged abuse adopt it as the norm.

    Professor van Schaik said: “An important factor in animal abuse is empathy. We found that adolescents who possessed less empathy were more likely to abuse animals.”

    Malcolm Plant said: “We discovered young people in Eastern Europe who had experienced domestic violence enacted aggression towards animals and went on to commit violence against individuals and society.”

    “Management of stray street animals in some Eastern European communities had diminished their social status and encouraged and exacerbated aggression against them, with children witnessing this unaddressed violence accepting it as normative behaviour, creating a cycle of abuse.”

    The research found violence breeds violence, with individuals who have been exposed to domestic abuse having also committed cruelty against animals. In rural areas where violence against animals is seen as more socially acceptable, adolescent males were more likely to abuse animals and had higher exposure to domestic violence.

    These adolescent males either showed displaced aggression against the stray animals or progressed to commit violence against family members.

    The Teesside University study acknowledges that while links between domestic violence as the catalyst to animal abuse are more challenging to address, cultural change is needed in societies which are accepting of animal abuse.